<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kim's public health blog &#187; vaccine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kimros.edublogs.org/tag/vaccine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kimros.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>Prevention is better than disease</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:46:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Vaccines and Autism Revisited</title>
		<link>http://kimros.edublogs.org/2008/05/14/vaccines-and-autism-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://kimros.edublogs.org/2008/05/14/vaccines-and-autism-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 22:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kimros</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimros.edublogs.org/2008/05/14/vaccines-and-autism-revisited/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fascinating &#8220;Perspective&#8221; on autism,. the MMR vaccine, the National Advisory Committee on Immunization and the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is presented in today&#8217;s New England Journal of Medicine (N. engl j med 358;20 may 15, 2008), which discusses the origin of the compensation program, and the failure of the program to follow a science [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fascinating &#8220;Perspective&#8221; on autism,. the MMR vaccine, the National Advisory Committee on Immunization and the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is presented in today&#8217;s New England Journal of Medicine (N. engl j med 358;20 may 15, 2008), which discusses the origin of the compensation program, and the failure of the program to follow a science base in its awards, opening the door to great injury to the vaccine program and setting the stage for another rush of pharmaceutical companies to flee from the vaccine field. If the current case in court is decided on feelings, rather than science, millions of people may die in the near future from lack of vaccines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kimros.edublogs.org/2008/05/14/vaccines-and-autism-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mumps Resurgent</title>
		<link>http://kimros.edublogs.org/2008/04/10/mumps-resurgent/</link>
		<comments>http://kimros.edublogs.org/2008/04/10/mumps-resurgent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kimros</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Immunization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mumps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimros.edublogs.org/2008/04/10/mumps-resurgent/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since Mumps vaccine was introduced there has been a significant drop in new cases, as seen in this graph.

However in 2006 a resurgence of mumps ocurred in the upper central USA.  There was only moderate uptake of a second dose of mumps  vaccine putting adolescents and young adults at risk.  This shows a similar pattern [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Mumps vaccine was introduced there has been a significant drop in new cases, as seen in this graph.</p>
<p><img border="0" width="450" src="http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/mumps06.jpg" alt="mumps incidence" height="200" /></p>
<p>However in 2006 a resurgence of mumps ocurred in the upper central USA.  There was only moderate uptake of a second dose of mumps  vaccine putting adolescents and young adults at risk.  This shows a similar pattern to the Measles outbreak in South Texas twenty years ago which lead to recommendation of a second dose of vaccine in middle school.  The difference was that 98%+ of the Texas students had received their vaccine dose as recommended. This was not the case with the mumps vaccine. Part of the problem is anxiety anong parents about supposed ill effects from vaccines, grossly overestimated but pushed by the media for its value as a scary story. Future studies will help to evaluate the national vaccine policy, including whether the administration of a second dose of MMR vaccine at a later age or the administration of a third dose would provide higher or more durable immunity.<br />
N Engl J Med 2008;358:1580-9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kimros.edublogs.org/2008/04/10/mumps-resurgent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
